Complaints Policy for a GP Practice: Letters and Deadlines With AI

A GP practice complaints policy should say how to complain, who handles it, that the practice acknowledges within three working days, how the response timescale is agreed, the 12-month time limit, and how to go to the ombudsman. AI can draft the letters, but only from anonymised facts that you have checked.

Deadlines are the part practices lose track of, because complaints arrive by post, email, phone and the front desk and the clock starts on receipt. A tracker that gives every complaint a received date, an acknowledgement due date and an agreed response date turns an anxious scramble into a routine. Drafting is the smaller job; AI mostly helps with the structure and tone, which is where letters in difficult situations go wrong.

Follow me on Instagram@sagnikteaches

What the policy has to say

NHS complaints are handled under a two-stage arrangement: the practice or the commissioner first, then the ombudsman. A patient can complain to the practice or to the commissioner (for GP services, the local integrated care board), but not both. The policy should explain that clearly in one page patients can follow. These are the headings I would include, in this order.

Connect on LinkedInSagnik Bhattacharya

1. How to complain. In person, by phone, by letter or by email, to whom, and that a complaint doesn't have to be in writing. Say the practice will write down a spoken complaint and give it back to the patient to check.
2. Who can complain. The patient, or someone acting for them. Where a third party complains on behalf of an adult, the practice needs the patient's consent, so say how that is obtained.
3. The time limit. Normally within 12 months of the event or of becoming aware of it, with a discretion to extend where there are good reasons and a fair investigation is still possible.
4. What happens next. Acknowledgement within three working days (by phone or in writing), an offer to discuss how the complaint will be handled and how long it is likely to take, updates on progress during the investigation, and a written response signed by the responsible person.
5. Who is responsible. The named responsible person and the complaints manager, and who deputises.
6. What a response includes. The findings, any apology, what the practice will change and the patient's right to take it further.
7. If the patient is still unhappy. The ombudsman, with its current contact details, and the free NHS complaints advocacy service, which can help a patient write a letter or come to meetings but can't make the complaint for them.
8. Learning. That complaints are logged, reviewed and reported to the practice team, and that the practice prepares the annual complaints report the regulations require for each year ending 31 March, available to anyone on request.

The regulations don't fix a number of days for the response. They require it as soon as reasonably practicable after the investigation, within the response period you discuss with the complainant (or set and notify in writing, if they don't take up the offer to discuss). There is one hard marker: if no response has gone out within six months of receipt, or a longer period agreed before those six months ran out, you must write to explain why and then respond as soon as you reasonably can. You can set your own target in the policy, for example 20 working days for a straightforward complaint, with a longer agreed date where the investigation is complicated. Whatever you choose, write it in the policy and in the acknowledgement so there is an agreed date to meet or to renegotiate.

Subscribe on YouTube@sagnikteaches

A deadline tracker that does the remembering

One spreadsheet or a shared task list is enough. Every complaint gets one row and the dates calculate themselves.

Conditional formatting that turns a row amber one working day before a date and red on the day makes it hard to miss. Keep the tracker free of names and clinical detail; the reference points to the full file in your clinical system.

How the log feeds the audit cycle

A complaints log is only useful if someone reads it as a whole. Once a quarter, count complaints by theme (appointments, communication, prescriptions, test results, staff attitude) and look for the biggest group. A theme that recurs is a candidate for a small audit, which the clinical audit template walks through step by step. Counts per theme are aggregate data, so an AI tool can help you present them without seeing any patient detail.

The AI drafting rules for this practice

A complaint is health information about an identifiable person, often with other people's names in it. These rules keep AI in a safe role.

• Never paste the complaint, the record or the patient's name. Write your own summary of the issues in neutral words and use codes: "the patient", "the GP", "the receptionist".
• Facts come from you. AI supplies structure, tone and plain-English phrasing. It does not decide what happened.
• A clinician or the complaints manager checks every sentence against the record before the letter goes out.
• No apology wording that nobody agreed. The responsible partner approves any apology and any statement about what went wrong.
• Use a tool your practice has approved. The data and consent checklist for clinic AI shows what to ask any supplier first.

Letter 1: the acknowledgement

This is the easiest letter to template, and the one with a fixed deadline. Draft it once with AI, then reuse it.

Write a short acknowledgement letter from a GP practice to a person who has complained, in warm, plain British English, under 200 words.
Include: thanks for raising it; the date we received the complaint [date]; the name of the person handling it [name, role]; an offer to talk through how we'll handle it and how long it is likely to take; the date we expect to respond [date] or "we will agree a date with you"; how to contact us [contact details]; that the patient may complain to the commissioner instead but not both.
Do not describe or comment on the substance of the complaint. Do not apologise for anything specific. Use [name] placeholders.

Illustrative result, trimmed: "Dear [name], thank you for contacting us on [date]. I'm sorry you've had cause to write, and I want to make sure your concerns are looked into properly. I'm [name], [role], and I'll be handling this. I'd be glad to talk it through with you by phone and agree how long it will take; if you'd rather we wrote to you, we'll respond by [date]..." What to fix: "I'm sorry you've had cause to write" is a generic expression of regret and acceptable if the partner agrees; "any inconvenience" phrases should be dropped; and the line about complaining to the commissioner has to match your policy exactly.

Letter 2: the holding letter

When the investigation will take longer than agreed, write before the date, not after it. A holding letter states what's been done, what's outstanding, the new date and why. For example: "We've spoken to the clinicians involved and are waiting for [one specific thing]. We'll write to you by [new date]." Ask the AI to write it from those facts, and keep it under 150 words. A missed date with no explanation is the commonest reason a manageable complaint escalates.

Letter 3: the response

The response is the one that matters. Give the AI an anonymised, structured set of facts and have it propose the shape of the letter.

Draft a complaint response letter from a GP practice. Use only the facts below. Structure: thank the complainant; summarise each concern in one sentence using their words; for each concern, what we found; what we are changing; apology where I have marked [APOLOGY APPROVED: wording]; how to take the complaint further.
Do not add facts, causes or explanations. Do not use legal language. Keep it under 600 words and at a reading age of about 12.
Facts: Concern 1: [summary]. Finding: [what the records and staff accounts show]. Concern 2: ...
Learning: [action, owner, date]

Illustrative extract of a good output: "You told us you were not given your test result for three weeks. Our records show the result was filed on [date] and you were contacted on [date]. That is longer than our target of five working days, and I'm sorry you had to wait. We have changed how Friday results are checked, which should prevent this happening again." Note what the model did well: it quoted the complaint, gave dates, apologised for the wait without a claim about care, and named the change. What to check: every date and every statement of what the records show, line against the record, by someone other than the drafter.

Apologies, candour and what not to write

Practices sometimes avoid apologising out of fear that it admits fault. The law says an apology, an offer of treatment or other redress does not of itself amount to an admission of negligence, and the statutory duty of candour requires registered providers to act openly and, when a notifiable safety incident occurs, to give the patient an account and an apology. That said, agree wording with the responsible partner, and take advice from your medical defence organisation where a complaint could lead to a claim or a regulatory referral. Practical rules for the letter:

• Apologise for what you can verify (a long wait, a missed call-back), not for what is disputed.
• Don't speculate about causes, or about other clinicians' decisions, that you haven't investigated.
• Don't promise outcomes ("this will never happen again"); promise actions.
• Don't include other patients' details, even to show a pattern.

A worked example with dates

Say a practice receives a written complaint by email on a Monday about a delayed referral letter. The tracker row gets a reference, a received date of Monday, an acknowledgement due date of Thursday (three working days), and a note that the patient is writing for themselves, so no third-party consent is needed. The manager sends the acknowledgement on Tuesday, offers a phone call, and in the call the patient agrees to a written response within 15 working days. The responsible GP reads the record, speaks to the secretary who sent the letter, and finds the letter was drafted on day two but not sent for a further eight working days because it sat in a task list. The manager writes down those facts in neutral words, in codes, and uses the prompt above to draft the response. The GP approves the apology wording ("I'm sorry your referral was delayed") and a change: the task list now shows letters waiting more than two working days in red. The response goes out on day 13, two working days before the agreed date. The row records the outcome as upheld, with the learning point, and the quarterly review notes that referral delays have now appeared three times, which prompts a small audit.

More examples of things AI should and shouldn't do here

Rewriting a defensive draft

Before: "As you will be aware from our policy, the surgery cannot be held responsible for delays outside our control." After, from a prompt asking for a warmer, factual rewrite: "I understand how frustrating it was to wait. The delay was with our referral process, and here is what we have changed." The model removes the defensive tone, but you must check that "the delay was with our referral process" is true.

Simplifying a clinician's explanation

A clinician's account of why a medicine was changed may be clear to colleagues and baffling to a patient. Paste only the clinician's anonymised explanation, with no patient detail, and ask for a version at a reading age of about 12. Then the clinician confirms the simpler version is still accurate.

Turning a phone complaint into a written record

If a patient complains by phone, the receptionist writes notes with a code, not a name, and the AI can tidy them into a neutral summary of the concerns for the file. The practice then sends the patient the summary to confirm it is right, as the policy promises.

Making the annual summary

At the end of the year, give the AI your aggregate counts (number received, by theme, upheld or not, acknowledged on time, responded on time) and ask for a one-page report for the practice meeting. No patient data is involved.

A third-party complaint and the consent step

Say a patient's daughter emails the practice about her father's care. The practice can't discuss his records with her unless he agrees, or unless he lacks capacity and she has the authority to act for him. So the acknowledgement does two jobs: it confirms the complaint and asks for the patient's consent. The tracker's "consent needed" column turns amber, the three-day acknowledgement still goes out, and the response clock effectively waits on the answer. The AI prompt for this letter is the same as the standard acknowledgement with one added instruction: "explain simply why we need [the patient's] written consent before we can share any information, and enclose a consent form". Illustrative wording: "We can only discuss your father's care with you if he agrees. I have enclosed a short form; he can sign it or tell us by phone." Check that the wording matches your policy and that the form is actually enclosed.

Complaint, concern or feedback?

Front-desk staff often have to decide at once whether something is a complaint. The safest rule is that if the person says it is a complaint, or is clearly unhappy and wants a response, it goes in the tracker. Small matters resolved on the spot (a booking error corrected, an apology given) can be recorded as concerns with a one-line note. Keeping the two separate stops the formal log filling with trivia, while the concern list still shows patterns. A quarterly count of both gives a fuller picture than complaints alone.

A response when the complaint isn't upheld

Not upheld doesn't mean unimportant, and a curt letter sends the patient to the ombudsman. Here is the shape to ask the AI for: thanks and acknowledgement of how the patient felt; a clear account of what the records show, with dates; the reason the practice believes its actions were appropriate, in plain words and agreed with the clinician; anything the practice will still do (such as reviewing how a decision was explained); and how to take the complaint further. Illustrative sentence to keep: "I understand that you expected a referral at that appointment. Having reviewed the record, [the GP] decided that [the clinical reason, agreed with the GP], and I can see that this was not explained clearly. I'm sorry for that." What to cut from any AI draft: sentences that argue with the patient, and phrases like "we stand by our decision". The facts and the clinical reasoning come from the clinician, not the model.

People who need the letter in a different form

Some complainants need large print, an easy-read version, an interpreter or a call instead of a letter. Add a line in the acknowledgement asking whether the patient needs the response in a particular format, and record the answer in the tracker. AI can help produce a simpler, shorter version of a response for an easy-read request, but a human must check that the simpler version hasn't dropped or changed anything important, and it is wise to read it aloud to a colleague who hasn't seen the original.

Training the team to handle the first contact

Most complaint problems are decided in the first five minutes. A ten-minute exercise at a team meeting helps: give each person an anonymised, invented scenario and ask them to say what they would write in the tracker and when the acknowledgement is due. Then ask the AI for three realistic invented scenarios (no real patients) that cover a phone complaint, a complaint about staff attitude and a third-party complaint, and use them as practice. The team learns the process on cases with no confidentiality risk, and the manager spots where people hesitate.

The pasted email that put a diagnosis in the reply

An illustrative case: a manager pastes a patient's email into a chatbot, with the name and a description of the illness, to "get a reply started". Two problems follow. The health information has left the practice's control, which a patient could reasonably be upset about, and the draft reply includes a sentence about a diagnosis the patient never mentioned, which the model has inferred. The fix is in the rules above: summarise in your own neutral, anonymised words, and don't let the tool near the original.

Checks before a letter leaves the building

1. Every date and every statement about the record has been checked against the record.
2. Any apology has been approved by the responsible partner, and the response is signed by the responsible person.
3. The letter answers each concern the patient raised, in the order they raised them.
4. The ombudsman and the patient's right to take it further are stated correctly and with current contact details.
5. No other patient or member of staff is identifiable.
6. The tracker row is updated with the sent date.

Where this fits with the rest of the front desk

Complaints often start as an unhappy phone call or an online review. Using AI at the clinic front desk safely covers the first contact, and replying to patient reviews without breaching confidence covers the public side. Whichever route a complaint takes, the tracker and the three letters above keep the response consistent, on time and written by people who have checked the facts.

Practice manager questions on complaints and AI

How quickly must we acknowledge a complaint?

The NHS complaints regulations require acknowledgement no later than three working days after the day you receive the complaint. It can be spoken or written, and it must offer to discuss how the complaint will be handled and how long the investigation and response are likely to take. Record both dates in your log.

How long does a patient have to complain?

Complaints should normally be made within 12 months of the incident or of the patient becoming aware of it. The time limit can be extended where there are good reasons for the delay and a fair investigation is still possible, which is for the complaints manager to decide.

Can we paste the complaint into ChatGPT to draft a reply?

Not as received. A complaint contains health information and names. Write your own anonymised summary of the issues, use codes for people, and have AI draft structure and wording from that. A clinician or the practice manager checks every fact against the record before sending.

Does saying sorry admit liability?

The law says an apology does not of itself amount to an admission of negligence, and the statutory duty of candour requires openness, including an apology, when a notifiable safety incident occurs. Wording still matters, so agree it with the responsible partner and, where there is any doubt, your medical defence organisation before it goes out.

Further reads

• How to Answer Restaurant Complaints With AI Without Escalating — A different sector's complaint tone, useful as a contrast.
• Is an AI Scribe Worth It for a Small Private Clinic? — Another practice-wide AI decision, with costs and consent.
• AI Note-Taking Tools for Therapists: A Confidentiality Checklist — A confidentiality checklist for AI note tools.
• Telling Patients You Use AI Note-Taking: Consent Wording That Works — Consent wording patterns for patients.
• How to Check AI Is Doing Good Work, Not Just Fast Work — How to check AI output is accurate, not just fast.
• How to Write an AI Usage Policy for Your Small Business — A written policy for what staff may put into AI tools.
• CQC and GP Practices: Build an Evidence Folder With AI — Organise a GP practice's CQC evidence by key question and quality statement, with an AI-built index, policy review log and mock-inspection summary.
• What Policies Should a GP Practice Have? Checklist and AI Drafts — A GP practice policy checklist grouped by risk, with a review calendar and tested prompts for drafting each policy with AI before a partner signs it off.
• AI Tools and AI Development: The Complete 2026 Guide — the AI hub, including every tutorial in the AI-for-business series.

Sources: NHS England's page on making a complaint (provider or commissioner but not both, 12-month time limit and its exception, advocacy, ombudsman), read 4 November 2026; the Local Authority Social Services and National Health Service Complaints (England) Regulations 2009, regulations 4, 12, 13, 14 and 18 (responsible person and complaints manager, time limit, three-working-day acknowledgement, response and six-month rule, annual report); the Compensation Act 2006, section 2 (apologies); the duty of candour regulation for registered providers.